Create stems that assess the areas in which you want to improve. These areas may include the following:
Delivery
Consider areas such as tone, rate, enunciation, volume, movement, contact
Structure
Consider areas such as organization, sign-posting, a declarative thesis, transitions, AGS plus tie to AGS in conclusion, order
Visual Integration
Consider production organization of images and terms, image impact, control of visuals, integration of source citations
Audience Address and Adaptation
Consider inclusion, appropriate topic selection, managing noise, adapting to physical context, "pinging" and bifuraction.
Credibility
Consider backing all claims with sources either verbally or visually, charisma, character, and competency.
So, if I were creating a rubric, it might look something like this:
1.The speaker's volume and rate in their delivery made the presentation easy to listen to and understand
Not at All Seldom Sometimes Most of the Time Always
1 2 3 4 5
2. The images used in the presentation related well to the speaker's message, conveying emotion.
Unrelated Seldom Related Related Effective Powerful
1 2 3 4 5
...and so on. Build your rubric to address where you feel you want to improve, or where you're unsure how you're performing.
Once you've gathered the data generated by your collected rubrics, use each stem to organize your results, probably quantitatively, and interpret what the data mean, then email me your analysis.
No comments:
Post a Comment